Production, Distribution, etc.)

(b) Information and Communications Network Promotion Act;

Violations

(c) Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

(2)

(d)Violation of the Child Welfare Act;

Sexual harassment, etc.

200 Before the 2020 Do 182 (Joint Attachment Orders)

9(Joint), (Chuncheon) 2020 Jeonno10(Joint) Judgment

1. Defendant case

Examining various circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the age, character and conduct, and environment of the Defendant and the person subject to the request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”), relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the circumstances asserted in the grounds of appeal, it is extremely unfair to maintain the judgment of the first instance court which sentenced the Defendant a maximum of ten years and a short of five years to the Defendant.

2. As to the case of the claim for attachment order

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal principles and records, it is justifiable for the lower court to order the Defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for ten years, and to maintain the first instance judgment that imposed the obligation, as it is, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the

3. Conclusion

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Ansan-chul et al.

Justices Noh Jeong-hee