beta
red_flag_2(영문) 서울고등법원 2006. 5. 18. 선고 2006나2836 판결

[대표자지위부존재확인][미간행]

Plaintiff and appellant

Plaintiff 1 and 2 others (Law Firm Ham, Attorney Kang Jong-sik, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Defendant church (Attorney Park Jong-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 27, 2006

The first instance judgment

Seoul Western District Court Decision 2005Kahap5164 Delivered on December 2, 2005

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. It is confirmed that the non-party is not the representative of the defendant.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasons why a member should explain this case are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiffs' appeal.

Judges Kang Young-ho (Presiding Judge)