The forty days of detention after the appeal shall be included in the original sentence.

According to the evidence cited by the court below, the defendant's act of assaulting the victim as stated in its holding, strong withdrawal of the property, and there is no violation of evidence or incomplete deliberation in the process of fact-finding, which is sufficient to prove that the defendant committed an assault against the victim as stated in its judgment, committed an attempted crime, and spawned in the order of 10 days old and present, and there is no error of violation of evidence or incomplete deliberation. In addition, the robbery, bodily injury, or bodily injury under Article 337 of the Criminal Act is established when the defendant injured or injured a person during the opportunity of robbery regardless of the time and attempted taking of the taking of the property, so it is legitimate for the court below to set the so-called "the defendant's judgment as a crime under Article 337 of the Criminal Act" and the punishment of 3 years and six months old and above against the defendant cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal under the opposite interpretation of Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and part of the detention days after the appeal is included in the original sentence. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Lee B-soo (Presiding Justice)