logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.04 2014고단8400
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for six months, for each of six months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Busan Dong-gu Office and the Busan Integrated Support Center for the Disabled have continued to perform environmental purification activities with the support of the competent police station for the safety of employees since July 2014 while they had difficulties due to some know-hows while cleaning around the Busan Station every year.

1. On August 29, 2014, around 15:30 on August 29, 2014, Defendant A, while drinking alcohol in the vicinity of the Busan Dong-gu Busan city, which was located in the Busan Dong-gu, and making it possible for pedestrians to do so, Defendant A obstructed the legitimate execution of duties in relation to crime prevention of the above F by assaulting the said F F by putting his blick belt on his hand, and by assaulting the F to go beyond the above F with his blick belt, which was done by the staff of the Busan Dong-gu Police Station E zone belonging to the Busan Dong-gu Police Station E zone, which performed environmental purification activities with the staff of the Busan Dong-gu Police Station E zone.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, committed an assault to the above F in order to arrest the Defendant A, who is the first instance offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties, as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and obstructed the lawful performance of duties concerning the arrest of the F in flagrant offender, by assaulting the F in his hand, such as taking the said F’s shoulder belt.

3. Defendant C, at the same time, at the same time, at the same place as the above paragraph (1), and at the same time, the above F, as a flagrant offender for the obstruction of performance of official duties, took a bath to the above F, and pushed the above F, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement of witness F and G;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant B) Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

arrow