1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) although the court added the judgment that it is difficult to see the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance even if it added evidence (Evidence Nos. 6 through 8, 9-1, 2, and 10) submitted by the plaintiff, it includes “related Acts and subordinate statutes” for the reasons of the judgment of the first instance, but “3. conclusion” is the same as the entry excluded from the court of first instance; and (b) thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.