Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2012, at around 15:30, the Defendant testified to the Daejeon District Court as follows: “Around July 15:30, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the instant case (2012Gahap126, etc.) such as the claim for service costs between C and D (hereinafter “Chin”), and then, at the time of presenting whether the Defendant is operating livestock wastewater treatment facilities, the Defendant testified to the following question: “I have the honor to attend the Ahinc at the time to make a report on the Ahinc, on the Ahcky’s day, and to do so as to whether I will do so

However, the facts are the same year from February 1, 201, stating that the defendant is operating logs for livestock wastewater treatment facilities.

3. According to weather observation data in the Boan region until February 28, 201, it was confirmed that: (a) the rain of rain and rain rain on February 8, 201; (b) the snow on the 12th day of the same month; (c) the snow on the 17th day of the same month; (d) the rain on the 28th day of the same month; (b) the eye opening on March 1, 201; (c) the rain on the 20th day of the same month; and (d) the rain on the 24th day of the same month; and (e) the Defendant did not verify and record the Arabic weather on a daily basis.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant at the court (the second trial date);

1. Application of the examination record, the place where the facilities to treat livestock wastewater are operated, and the Korea Meteorological Administration's data output statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is an offense that damages the judicial function of the State and undermines the discovery of substantial truth, and the nature of the offense is not weak.

However, the fact that the defendant is too late to commit this part of the crime, because the part of the perjury does not relate to the important issues of the above case, it seems that there is no particular influence on the trial result, and the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal power.