1. The Plaintiff; Defendant B shall be KRW 61,00,000; Defendant C shall be KRW 57,000,000; and each of the above amounts shall be from October 10, 2014.

According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3 and the whole arguments, it is recognized that the plaintiff lent to defendant B a sum of KRW 61 million up to August 25, 2004, and the sum of KRW 57 million up to November 26, 2009, respectively, to defendant C, and thus, the plaintiff is obligated to pay to the plaintiff damages for delay as to the above money.

The plaintiff asserts that he additionally lent KRW 10 million to the defendant B on October 30, 2004. Thus, there is no dispute between the parties as to the facts that the defendant B prepared the content of No. 2 (Evidence No. 2) and signed and sealed on the bottom. Meanwhile, according to the entries and shapes of No. 1 and 2, the date of preparation of No. 2 (Evidence No. 30, Oct. 30, 2004) stated as "No. 4" is different from other letters, and the difference between the two values is different from the two values, and the two values are different from the two values of No. 1 (Evidence No. 4) written by the plaintiff B as the part of No. 1 (Evidence No. 1) written by the defendant B, and there is no additional difference between the two points "No. 1,000,000,000,000 won, and there is no other evidence that the plaintiff made the No. 2 (Evidence No. 2,000,00,000,0).

Defendant B submitted a written answer on November 3, 2014, which recognizes the fact that he borrowed KRW 71 million from the Plaintiff, and was absent on the date for the first pleading of the instant case, and thus deemed that the said written reply was presented. However, Defendant B was present on November 24, 2014, and was present on the date for the second pleading of the instant case, and was hospitalized at the hospital at the time of the preparation of the said written reply.