The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, and improper sentencing) did not deceiving the victims of fraud, and there was no indecent act committed against the victims of forced indecent act.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which recognized the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and legal principles.

The sentence of the court below is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. 1) Determination of the misapprehension of the legal doctrine on the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine is based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court. In other words, the Defendant would pay KRW 100 million after the victim I received investment money from the investor H of the “F”, a primary company specializing in cruel business.

말하였고, H이 그 무렵 피고인에게 투자금을 지급하였으나, 피고인은 이를 피해자에게 알리지 아니하였고 돈을 변제하지도 아니하였던 점, ② 피고인은 피해자들 로부터 돈을 차용할 당시 이 부분 공소사실 기재와 같이 자력이 없었고, 2014. 1. 경 ‘F ’를 개업하였으나 투자자들에게 수익금을 지급하지 못할 정도로 수익이 나빴음에도 피해자 M에게 변제를 약속하고 돈을 차용하였던 점, ③ 피고인도 원심 법정에서 이 부분 공소사실의 사실관계는 인정하였던 점 등에 비추어 볼 때 피고인이 미필적으로나마 변제할 의사나 능력이 없음에도 피해자들을 기망하여 차용금을 편취한 사실을 인정할 수 있다.

The defendant's mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles as to fraud shall not be accepted.

2) In a case where a witness’s statement, including the victim of a forced indecent act, is mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, it shall not be rejected without permission, unless there exist any separate and reliable evidence to deem that the witness’s statement is extremely reliable from an objective point of view. The witness’s statement in the major part is consistent with the witness’s statement concerning other insignificant matters.