The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. On August 3, 2014, the Defendant, at the residence of the victim D (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”) located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “C”), made a false statement to the complainant that “The Defendant sold a motor vehicle owned by the Party and used the price for daily expenses because there is no living cost until the Party enters the workplace.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the purchase price to the complainant after acquiring an automobile from the complainant.

The Defendant, by deceiving the complainant as such, received from the complainant a delivery of YF Hamna (E) equivalent to the market price of KRW 20 million owned by the complainant in the same place.

2. According to the witness D and the defendant's respective legal statements and the original register of vehicle registration, the defendant and the complainant were living together at the time of the instant case, and the complainant purchased a motor vehicle as stated in the facts charged on September 6, 2013 and made the defendant drive and accompany the vehicle. Among them, the fact that the defendant transferred a document from the complainant on August 3, 2014 and sold the motor vehicle and did not pay the proceeds thereof to the complainant.

If the witness D and the defendant make each legal statement, the defendant would sell an automobile and use it as living expenses while living together with the complainant.

According to the proposal, the complainant's consent and transfer of documents to the defendant's sales of the motor vehicle, and immediately after the sale of the motor vehicle, the defendant can recognize the fact that the defendant left the dwelling where he had resided with the complainant (the defendant was found to have left the dwelling of the complainant at the time of preparation of the suspect examination protocol by the prosecution

However, when the complainant makes a statement, it is more reliable that the complainant's testimony is more reliable, but the defendant and the complainant's reason why the complainant moves out from the residence of the complainant is.