1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as annual 5% from May 24, 2018 to November 30, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff and C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on August 18, 2006, and have one parent under the chain.

B. In November 2017, the Defendant came to know of C as a guest at the head office that he operated. From January 2018, 2018, the Defendant conspiredd with C with C, and committed several unlawful acts, such as having sexual intercourses, knowing C’s spouse, from January 2018.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry and video of Gap's 1 through 6 (including each number), and the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination

A. The act that a third party who is liable for damages causes mental distress to the spouse by infringing on or interfering with the common life of the married couple falling under the essence of marriage and infringing on the rights of the spouse as the spouse by committing an unlawful act with the spouse of the married couple constitutes tort in principle.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 201Meu2997 Decided November 20, 2014). According to the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant inflicted mental pain on the Plaintiff by committing an unlawful act with C, a spouse of the Plaintiff, and thereby, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant inflicted mental pain on the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Plaintiff is obliged to do so in money.

B. Considering the following circumstances as to the amount of consolation money that the Defendant is liable to compensate to the Plaintiff, the amount of consolation money shall be determined as KRW 15,00,000,000, in consideration of the health team, the period of marriage and family relationship between the Plaintiff and C, the content, degree and duration of the unlawful act committed by the Defendant and C, the impact of the Defendant’s unlawful act on the marital life between the Plaintiff and C, and the developments leading up to and after

C. Accordingly, according to the theory of lawsuit, the Defendant is liable for the performance of the obligation of the Defendant from May 24, 2018, which was clearly recorded that it was the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, as sought by the Plaintiff, as the damages amounting to KRW 15,00,000 for damages to the Plaintiff, and since