logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2019.02.14 2018가합51357
유치권 부존재 확인
Text

1. It is confirmed that there is no lien of Defendant C Co., Ltd with respect to the ships listed in the attached Form;

2. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B, under the trade name of “C” on April 1, 1982, engaged in the manufacture and repair of vessels, and established Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) on April 10, 2012, and assumed office as the representative director of the Defendant Co., Ltd.

B. Around May 8, 2012, Defendant B resigned from the office of representative director of the Defendant Company, and Defendant B’s son was appointed by Defendant B at the representative director of the Defendant Company and is working as the representative director of the Defendant Company until now.

D On May 8, 2012, he/she was appointed as the representative director of the Defendant Company, but retired on April 10, 2015. On June 12, 2015, he/she was appointed as the representative director of the Defendant Company again on June 12, 2015, but retired on June 12, 2018.

Defendant B has been actually operating the Defendant Company together with his own children D until now.

C. On March 25, 2016, the Defendant Company requested the repair of a ship listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant ship”) owned by E from E (hereinafter “E”) and entered into a vessel repair contract (hereinafter “instant repair contract”) with E as KRW 422,763,00 (including value-added tax) and completed the repair of the instant ship around August 2016.

On August 9, 2016, Defendant B prepared a notarial deed (hereinafter “instant notarial deed”) with respect to the repair cost of the instant vessel with F Co., Ltd., a joint and several surety of E and E (hereinafter “F”), as follows:

On the other hand, Defendant B and F made a special agreement that, if an electronic bill issued by F to Defendant B is settled normally on the same day, Defendant B would have only claim amounting to KRW 100 million out of the repair cost stated in the instant notarial deed.

Article 1 E and F of the notarial Deed of Debt Repayment (Quasi-Loan for Consumption) Contract to Defendant B on August 9, 2016.

arrow