A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

Part 1 (Evidence No. 2), Part 2, 000,000 (Evidence No. 3), which was seized.

Criminal facts

On September 18, 2009, the Incheon District Court sentenced the defendant to two years and six months of imprisonment, and the execution of the above punishment on July 9, 2016, on the following grounds: (a) the defendant and the person who requested the attachment order and the protective observation order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") to the effect that the defendant were sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes, Protection of Victims thereof, etc. (special rape), robbery, etc.; and (b) the execution of the above punishment was completed.

[Criminal facts] 2018 Gohap 61

1. Around 05:09 on January 28, 2018, the Defendant, at the F convenience store located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, took a view that the victim D, an employee, would have expressed a view that he would inflict an injury on the victim by taking out the kitchen knife, which is a dangerous object in possession of the kitchen knife, in advance, from the F convenience store in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, to the victim D, who is an employee. The Defendant took a 350,000 won in cash in possession of the victim in the knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-knife-kn

2. Around January 28, 2018, the Defendant, at the I convenience store located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, 08:50 on January 28, 2018, took an attitude that the victim G, an employee of the victim G, would be at the risk of causing harm to the victim in the part of the kitchen, which is a dangerous object that he was in possession of the locker, in advance, from the victim G.

On July 7, 2017, the Defendant ordered the victim K in the Jung-gu Daejeon Daejeon District Court Decision 201:10 01:25 on July 7, 2017, the Defendant ordered the victim K to 1mal, 3 Cin, etc.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price even if he received food from the injured party due to the lack of money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and added the market price to the victim.