The incidental appeal by Defendant Q Q is dismissed.

Of the judgment of the first instance, the amount ordered to be paid below.

An ex officio appeal on the legitimacy of Defendant Q’s appeal may be filed only for a disadvantageous trial to his own. Therefore, an appeal on the entire winning judgment is unlawful as there is no benefit.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Da20235 Decided July 13, 2007, etc.). We examine the following facts: (a) The plaintiffs claimed damages against the defendants for each tort; and (b) the first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing all the plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Q on May 15, 2020. It is obvious in the records.

Since Defendant Q was sentenced to a favorable judgment in the first instance court, it cannot be deemed that Defendant Q was disadvantageously sentenced to the judgment, Defendant Q Q’s incidental appeal is unlawful as there is no benefit.

The court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is identical to the statement of the reasons in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal below, and partial modification of the conclusion of the court of first instance. Thus, it cites it pursuant to the main sentence of

(Other, the grounds alleged by the Plaintiffs and some Defendants in the appeal do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance is examined, the first instance judgment is legitimate). The part (Plaintiff B) added to the Plaintiff (Plaintiff B) is not the Plaintiff in the preceding case, and it does not affect the res judicata.

There is no evidence that the plaintiff BZ is the plaintiff in the preceding case.

Rather, as recognized earlier, the Plaintiff BZ recognizes the fact that it is not included in the Plaintiffs of the preceding case.

Therefore, Defendant A’s prior defenses against the Defendants on the merits of the Plaintiff B are without merit. 5 pages 18 and 19 “Plaintiff WW Trade Union X branch A Z branch” are chips with “Plaintiff WW Trade Union MN branch A Z branch”.

The 6th 6th 6th chi trade union, etc. shall read “W Trade Union, Plaintiffs MJ (MO Branch), Plaintiffs MI (MO Branch), MP (MP Branch), and so on.