logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.22 2015누40806
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "No 16" and "No 6" and "No 6" are attached to the 4th part of the judgment of the court of the first instance, and the 6th "(or an elevator for cargo has no warning phrase to prevent any person from putting on board the elevator inside the elevator, unlike general elevators, it is installed outside the elevator and outside the elevator, so it is impossible to operate the elevator by correcting the following door loaded with the cargo from outside the elevator and operating the elevator. In light of the fact that the deceased can use the elevator for cargo after opening a steel door of the second half and opening the closing and closing system installed on the entrance for entering the elevator into the inside the elevator, it cannot be said that the deceased's death and no 20th of the judgment of the court of the first instance added it to the main sentence of Article 82 of the Civil Procedure Act other than the defect of the elevator for cargo management or 40th of the judgment of the court of first instance."

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow