logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원장흥지원 2020.08.26 2020가단248
대여금
Text

The defendant's KRW 150,60,819 and KRW 66,274,881 among the plaintiff's KRW 150,660 and KRW 66,274,881 each year from April 3, 2020 to April 23, 2020.

Reasons

1. Principal and interest on loans, such as indication of claims;

2. In a reply under Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts, the purport of the reply shall be stated in the reply, in addition to the reply to the purport of the request, as to whether the facts are recognized for the individual facts

(Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure (Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure). However, although the defendant submitted a written objection against the payment order on May 4, 2020, the above written objection only stated the phrase “I will raise an objection because the defendant is dissatisfied with the payment order,” and did not state any reply as to the facts alleged by the plaintiff as the cause of the claim, and since the above written objection was not present at the date of pleading, it is deemed that the defendant led to the confession of the plaintiff’s assertion (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045, Jul. 25,

arrow