logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.12.21 2015고단2204
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 2204"

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident) are those who are engaged in driving a car with X-ray.

On June 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 08:25, and continued the intersection in front of the E outdoor parking lot in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, to a pair of soup and soup.

Since there is no signal signal, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and to operate safely by checking well the left and right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting his duty at the front time, received the front part of the victim F (the age of 48) driving G UD car, which was driven on the right side by negligence in the course of driving the car as is, and then received the front part of the said TD car from the right side of the said TD car, and received the front glass owned by the victim H, which was located in the vicinity of the said TDD car.

As a result, the Defendant, by its occupational negligence, caused the injury to the said F to the salt panion, etc. in need of medical treatment for approximately two weeks, and caused the victim Jin (here, 35 years old) who was on the top of the operation of the said AF car to suffer injury to the said AF, such as an unknown brain rash, which requires medical treatment for about one week, and at the same time, destroyed the AF car to the extent that approximately KRW 6,481,750 for repair cost is about KRW 23,90,000 for repair cost, and escaped without immediately stopping the vehicle to the extent that there is about KRW 23,90,000 for repair cost, and without taking measures such as aiding the victim.

2. When the Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as in the above Paragraph 1, was faced with the risk of the Defendant’s drinking operation due to the foregoing traffic accident, he made a statement to K who was seated at the early string, and asked K to make a statement to drive the said vehicle.

Therefore, the above K was called up after receiving a report at the same time and place.

arrow