1. The Defendant’s notary public against C is an executory exemplification of a notarial deed drawn up in No. 2, 2017.

1. The Defendant’s determination as to the cause of the claim is recognized as follows: (a) on August 1, 2017, with respect to each movable (other than No. 13) listed in the separate sheet No. 2017No. 2776, a notary public of the Republic of Korea against C as an executory exemplification of the No. 2017, No. 2017, Aug. 1, 2017, with the title of title; and (b) each movable (other than No. 13) listed in the separate sheet No. 13) owned by the Plaintiff, without any dispute between the parties;

Therefore, the compulsory execution against each movable(other than 13) listed in the separate sheet is illegal as it is against the property owned by a person who is not the debtor, and thus the compulsory execution should not be allowed.

2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.