The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (700,000 won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Unless the first instance court’s determination of sentencing is deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, or the first instance court’s determination of sentencing is deemed to be unreasonable in full view of the newly discovered materials in the appellate court’s appellate court’s determination of sentencing, it is reasonable to respect the first instance court’s determination of sentencing, unless there exist circumstances such as deeming that it is unfair

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as an element of sentencing were already revealed and sufficiently considered during the hearing process of the lower court. There was no new circumstance that could change the sentence of the lower court in the trial. In addition, considering all the sentencing factors indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, process and process of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentencing is too excessive and thus, cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.