1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. On December 1, 201, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval for additional medical care to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. At around 11:00 on April 15, 200, the Plaintiff completed a astronomical work at the construction site located in Kimhae-si B, Kimhae-si, and completed an accident that both shoulders face on the wall because the center of the sloping bridge is shaking, while the slopings are coming down on the wall (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The Defendant applied for medical treatment after a diagnosis by the Defendant, “the prone scale of the scale of the scale, the right shoulder collision, the right shoulder collision, the left-hand scale of the shoulder, the left-hand scale of the shoulder, the left-hand scale of the shoulder collision (hereinafter “the scale scale disease”).

B. On September 2, 2010, the Defendant issued a medical care approval disposition with respect to the right-hand shoulder, the right-hand shoulder collision, but the Defendant issued a disposition not to grant medical care on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the business of the left-hand shoulder, the left-hand shoulder collision and the left-hand shoulder.

C. On December 16, 2010, the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee made a request for reexamination to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee decided to revoke the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of part of the above medical care. Accordingly, the Plaintiff was judged as Grade 14 of the disability grade after receiving medical treatment until May 31, 201 for the first injury and disease and closing the medical care.

After that, on July 20, 201, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the instant injury and disease” (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”), and on October 22, 201, filed an application for approval of additional injury and additional medical care with the Defendant regarding the instant injury and disease, but the Defendant cannot be deemed to have additionally discovered the injury and disease caused by the instant accident or the injury and disease caused by the occupational accident.