logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.07.11 2019고정286
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 5, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) and two years of suspended execution in the Incheon District Court’s Busan District Court’s Branch, and the said judgment was finalized on February 1, 201

On October 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) connected to the Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao 26 residents of Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-dong, and Kdong, using the Defendant’s mobile phone, and posted a letter stating that “In spite of the fact that the victim E is not a re-building-related party, the Defendant is all illegal re-building-related parties.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of some police officers against the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Materials concerning collection of evidence by complainants;

1. Division: The defendant's legal statement, criminal history record, etc. inquiry shall be the lessee of Bupyeong-si B apartment L, a household adjacent to the defendant's residence, who is not related to reconstruction; the defendant did not properly assert or vindicate the victim's relation to the reconstruction of the above apartment at this court or investigation agency; and the investigation agency made a statement to the effect that the victim was not referred to as an illegal reconstruction-related person by the statement of the facts in this case; the defendant appears to have been aware of the victim's identity as the victim; however, it cannot be deemed that the victim was aware of the "P" in the above Kakakao Pacific, but it did not have paid considerable attention necessary to verify the identity of the above Kakao Kao Ka; and the extent of the user of the above Kating; and the above.

arrow