Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service C.

Around 15:50 on January 15, 2014, when the Defendant was negligent in performing his duties on the road front of the 10-6-6-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, Jung-gu, Daegu to a large area four-distance bank, and due to his occupational negligence, the Defendant did not find out the victim D(81) who crosses the road to the right side from the left side of the direction where the Ortotoa is running, and caused the injury of the victim, such as cerebral cerebral cerebrovassis, where the victim could not know of the treatment period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Whether a medical certificate or medical statement is serious;

1. A traffic accident report or a traffic accident report (1) (2) (2));

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (report attaching a medical certificate);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [Scope of Recommendation] General Traffic Accident Type 1 (Aggravated Injury resulting from Traffic Accidents) (Aggravated Mitigation) in the basic area (Aggravated Mitigation in April to October) (Aggravated Punishment) where the victim was negligent in causing traffic accidents or expanding damage (Aggravated Punishment Decision / (Aggravated Punishment 1)] In the instant accident, the victim was hospitalized for more than 6 months and the recognition function has deteriorated so that normal communication is not possible until now, although the defendant was the primary offender, the defendant was the primary offender, and the mistake has been divided and reflected; the victim was crossing without permission at the time of the accident; the victim was covered by the liability insurance policy; the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered as a whole.