The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing (a fine of three million won) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant reflects his mistake, that the defendant agreed with the investigative agency to the victim, and that the defendant has no particular criminal record except for punishment of a fine once due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant and his accomplice on the grounds that female employees were neglected or neglected in contact while drinking alcohol in entertainment taverns, and thus, it is not good that the Defendant committed the crime of this case and his accomplice interfered with the business of leaving the beer with the beer, such as destroying a beer, accompanying a monitor of singing-sing machines, etc., and taking into account the equity with the case similar to the crime of this case, and taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background leading to the crime of this case, the method and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., as a whole, it is difficult to see that the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.