A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

excessive one percent (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and two years of suspended execution in the Daejeon District Court, and is currently under suspended execution.

On September 23, 2015, the Defendant became aware of the victim E (n, 42 years of age) in D operated by himself (n, n, n, n, n, n, n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

On September 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 11:50 on September 24, 2015, the Defendant: (b) was unable to resist the Defendant with the view to having the Defendant’s seated in the drinking house F loan 202, the Defendant, in front of the drinking house entrance in which the victim resides; (c) the victim refused to meet, and without opening the door.

Accordingly, the victim, the principal offender, and the defendant opened the front door, and entered the victim into the front door, and made up for it a deadly weapon (the total length of 20.5cm, 10.5cm in length on the day, 10.5cm in length, 10.1), and the part of the victim's distribution and the chest part twice, which are a deadly weapon, were inflicted on the right side, each right side of which requires approximately 4 weeks medical treatment on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to E, G, and H;

1. Police seizure records;

1. In light of various circumstances such as the investigation report (related to the victim's upper part), the letter of commission, the photograph, and the CCTV to the effect that the defendant was physically and mentally deprived or physically weak at the time of the crime of this case, the defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental and physical loss or mental weakness at the time of the crime of this case. Thus, according to the above evidence, it is acknowledged that the defendant was aware of the fact that the defendant was at the time of the crime of this case, but he was able to discern things for the victim's front time while preparing for the excessive amount of money and driving his car directly at the motherel where the defendant left for five minutes after driving his car at the time of the crime of this case. In light of such various circumstances, the defendant's ability to distinguish things for the purpose of the restoration from water at the time of the crime of this case.