The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant charged with the facts of the crime. The Defendant is a person running the Category D Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do, and the person running the dan Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do was prohibited from acting as a guest with the guest, or acting as a guest with singing or dancing. However, the Defendant violated the code of conduct of the Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do by having an employee E drink from February 1 to 0

2. The above facts charged include a witness F and G’s each legal statement, a witness E’s statement in the third trial record, and a F’s statement that the prosecutor submitted as evidence of guilt. However, at the time of the instant case, the witness E stated to the effect that at the time of the instant case, the said witness E merely singing the singing music in a singing machine and singing the customers at the time of the instant case, and the witness F stated to the effect that the situation at the time of the instant case’s being under the influence of alcohol is not memory at the time of the instant case at the court. The witness F sing alcohol together with an employee (second in the name) who was in the investigative agency’s content.

As to “the part indicated”, he only stated to the effect that he did not drink in the instant danran bar, and that his female employees did not drank together with other female employees, and that he did not drink at all at the time of the instant Garan bar court, and the witness G also stated in the court that he did not drink together with the female at the time of the instant Garan bar, which he knew in an individual’s ordinary sense, and that he did not drink with E. As such, the above evidence cannot be deemed as evidence of conviction supporting the facts charged, and the remaining evidence also cannot be admissible as long as the Defendant denies the contents of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant while denying the facts charged.