(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.09 2016가합568567

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.09 2016가합568567

용역비

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a service agreement (hereinafter “instant service agreement”) with the Defendant on June 2015, 2015, with a view to carrying out the business of constructing new apartments and officetels on the ground (hereinafter “instant business”), which is executed by the Defendant, the Plaintiff entered into a service agreement relating thereto (hereinafter “instant service agreement”). Around June 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a service agreement (i.e., “business service agreement” (i., the evidence Nos. 4) stating the following.

Article 3 [Scope of Business] A project owner (the defendant, hereinafter the same shall apply) shall take charge of real estate sales contracts and investment in funds for initial business expenses in land in the project site.

The scope of the work to be provided by the recipient (the plaintiff, hereinafter the same shall apply) under this Agreement shall be as follows, and other items shall be separately consulted:

(2) Financial support (PF business) related to subscription for officetels, and support for publicity. (4) Article 4 [Business Remuneration and Payment for Changeable after consultation with the contractor] of the head of a Si/Gun/Gu

1.As a result of the repair of services under Article 3 of the recipient, the ordering person shall pay to the recipient KRW 60 (see e.g., e., e., e.g.

(PF) Payment of the full amount of the indication

2. The addition under Article 3 shall be paid to the recipient by consultation.

Article 7 【Treating Drugs】

1. If the recipient fails to perform the tasks and obligations set out in Articles 3 and 5 without good cause, this Agreement shall be terminated immediately.

3. Where a person placing an order and a person placing an order intend to cancel a contract because they have failed to perform their mutual obligations, they shall notify each other of them within ten days, and such notification shall be made in a way that it can always take legal

4. The project owner shall provide this service contract where it is impracticable to implement the project due to a delay, change, etc. in the terms and conditions (such as construction costs) with the contractor.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.27 2016가합501731

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.06 2019가합504526

-창원지방법원 2017.11.23 2017가합50396

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.13 2015가단170386

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.14 2018가합587302