logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.06 2016고정101
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

가. 재물 손괴 피고인은 2015. 11. 10. 19:50 경 제주시 C, 피해자 D( 여, 52세) 가 경영하는 E 분식점 앞을 지나가다 위 분식점에서 떡볶기를 판매하지 않으면서 떡볶기 메뉴가 적힌 현수막을 분식점 앞에 달아 놓았다는 이유로 시가 7만 원 상당의 위 떡볶기 메뉴가 적힌 현수막을 손으로 뜯어 내 어 손괴하고,

B. At the time and place of the above “A”, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire to remove the banner from the window of the horse, and (b) expressed the victim’s “this e-year son, two-year son; and (c) the victim demanded the victim to take out of the window of the window, disregarding this demand; and (d) the victim’s desire continued to take out of the window of the window, thereby interfering with the victim’s duties leaving the window of the window.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and F;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for a crime: Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of causing damage to property). Selection of fines for a crime;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: It shall be decided as per the Disposition for not less than Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow