A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 14:45, at the close fluence of the victim D (n, 63 years old); (b) around 14:45, at around 13, 2017, the Victim D (n, 63 years old); (c) on the ground that the victim’s mother at the issue of land boundary between E and E, caused the victim to restrain the Defendant by doing so; and (d) on the part of the victim’s right by sticking stick (100cm in length) such as alkbbbbuck material of alkin, which is a dangerous object, the victim’s fluent machine (65cm in total).

Defendant 1 inflicted injury on the victim, such as the lag’s inception, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, by the foregoing method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Two copies of a copy of the damaged photograph, and one copy of a photograph of a criminal tool;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report the occurrence of the case and report on investigation (to hear statements from victims on telephone conversations, etc.);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Quantity (i.e., the fact that the defendant recognized the crime by an investigative agency, there was no record of punishment previously committed by the same kind of crime, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case by contingency, the degree of injury to the victim by the crime of this case is relatively heavy, and the defendant is old and is not good, etc. favorable to the defendant);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the above consideration has been made for the above defendant);

1. On February 12, 2018, after the closure of pleadings, the Defendant and his/her defense counsel led to a confession of all the facts charged at the first trial date of the Defendant’s argument and defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation. However, on February 12, 2018, the Defendant and defense counsel submitted an objection to the prosecutor’s charges to deny the

First of all, the defendant's use to take advantage of the victim.