logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.04.26 2017고단151
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 10, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the 2nd floor B of the 1112 B of the Gunsan Police Station, the Defendant was under the influence of liquor around 01:20 on February 10, 2017, and D and assistant E of the police box belonging to the Gunsan Police Station C, which was dispatched upon receipt of a report by 112

For the reason of being asked “I”, “I am argue”, and am argue D’s face was continuously taken one time at the right hand and the head slope E’s face was continued.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act shall be deemed to be interference with the performance of official duties (in June to one year), which is the basic area (in June to one year), [the sentence] [the nature of the crime of this case in which the commission of violence was committed to police officers in the performance of official duties. However, although the nature of the crime of this case in which the defendant was found to be erroneous and against the defendant, the fact that the defendant was found to be erroneous and against the defendant, and that there was no criminal record beyond the fine, etc., the sentence shall be determined as per the order, taking into account all

arrow