A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 18:10 on July 29, 2018, the Defendant parked a coo vehicle in front of C Et in front of C, “Si, Gunsan,” while parked a coo vehicle in front of C, thereby making it difficult for the Defendant to drive the coo vehicle in front of C, and the Defendant was demanded to request F to change the Defendant’s active transportation vehicle from F, a auxiliary police officer of the North Korean National Police Agency, who was called upon receiving a report from D and Si expenses while driving the coo vehicle in front of the coo vehicle, parked the coo vehicle in front of the coo vehicle with a large angle, thereby preventing the passage of the coo vehicle and general vehicle.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인이 위 의무경찰의 요구를 무시하고 D에게 달려들어 몸싸움을 하려고 하여 위 의무경찰이 이를 만류하자 갑자기 “ 이런 씹할, 나이도 어린 짭새새끼가, 딱지를 떼든지 알아서 해라.

In the phrase, “scapping down,” the act of assaulting the flab of the police officer, flabing the shoulder with the left hand, leading about about 4-5 meters, flabing the flab, and flabing about three times by the left hand of the police officer.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the prevention of a crime by a auxiliary police officer on duty and the maintenance of order of happiness in the G police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D or F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that the defendant reflects the crime, that it is favorable that F appeals the defendant's prior action by mutual agreement with F and F. It is necessary to strictly punish a crime detrimental to the function of the State by impeding the legitimate exercise of public authority, and that the degree of the power of the defendant's exercise of authority is not easy.