logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.03.09 2015고단1827
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 13, 2015, the Defendant assaulted D by booming D’s d(34 tax) and bat around 00:25, when drinking together with drinking together with drinking at “C main point located in Jeju City B”, and by drinking together with drinking d’s bat around her hand.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the description in the preceding paragraph, was dissatisfied with the victim E (36 years old) whose advertising board of the Acryle material on the table was on the B B, and who was on the B’s line.

As a result, the defendant added approximately three weeks of treatment to E, an open prize room, etc.

3. The Defendant was dissatisfied with the foregoing D at the same time, time, and place as indicated in the preceding paragraph, and was incidental to the Victim F, who is the operator of C’s main store, in excess of the harmony owned by the victim F, and was accompanied by the Acryry advertising board as above.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged F’s property.

4. On December 13, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested as a flagrant offender and on the part of a police officer, such as a police officer, who was dispatched after receiving a report at the same place as the preceding paragraph, and was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of assault, injury, etc., and was on board the patrol vehicle.

The Defendant assaulted H by walking the face of the above H one time in the patrol car, and putting the h in the entrance, four strings of the H.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers on criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Each statement prepared in F, I, H, and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), the choice of imprisonment for each case;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is the same.

arrow