Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 High Court Decision 1030]

1. The chairperson of a promotion committee or a project implementer (in cases of a cooperative, referring to its representative, if the owner of a cooperative, an executive, land for an urban environment improvement project, etc. independently implements the rearrangement project) shall comply with the relevant request, if the cooperative members or owners, such as the audit report on the implementation of the rearrangement project, details of monthly deposits and withdrawals, and related data have been requested to peruse or duplicate the rearrangement project;

Nevertheless, on May 1, 2014, the Defendant, while working as the president of the reconstruction and consolidation project association located in D at the time of around the 2008, rejected the request without justifiable grounds, such as F, G, H, H, and I as a member of the said association, “annual settlement data from 2007”, “the details of monthly deposits and withdrawals (including copies and receipts of the head of the association) after 2012,” “the details of deposits and withdrawals in the name of the head of the association (limited to the part of the details of deposits and withdrawals related to the implementation of the project)”, “the detailed details of the cash settlement document (including the number of units) and evidentiary materials of the liquidation amount”, and “the details of the cash settlement document”.

[2015 High Court Decision 1066]

2. From November 4, 2011, the Defendant is the head of the reconstruction and consolidation project association of approximately 1,750 E re-building and rearrangement project association at approximately 1,750 square meters in Pakistan.

An executive of a cooperative shall not hold a general meeting with attendance of a majority of its members, and enter into a contract that shall be borne by its members, except as otherwise prescribed by the budget without obtaining a resolution with the consent of

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the above partnership office on July 24, 2014, entered into a contract for the establishment of the right to collateral security with the creditor of the partnership as the creditor of the partnership, and with the maximum amount of the claim amount of KRW 1.3 billion as the creditor of the above partnership on July 24, 2014. On the same day, K representative L, the creditor of the construction price of the partnership, shall be the creditor of the above partnership, and the maximum amount of the claim amount shall be KRW 3.6 billion.