logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.06.12 2018고단241
특수상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person working in ‘D' in 1,00, and the victim E (31) is a person who supplies goods to the above D.

around 00:15 on December 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 00:15, on the ground that the Defendant was unloading without classifying the type of goods supplied by the victim E, and (b) was frighted by the victim’s knife and pushed down the part of the victim’s knife and pushed down the victim’s head; and (c) was collected by the victim’s head and knife with the victim’s head.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in the cryp of the cryp that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

In addition, the defendant continued to commit assaulting the victim by getting out of the victim's length 80cm, which is a dangerous thing.

[A public prosecutor prosecuted the Defendant for a special injury. In other words, the circumstances acknowledged by the following evidence: ① the time when the Defendant was faced with her head and her head (hereinafter “the first time”) and the time when she was faced with her head and her head; ② the Defendant had carried dangerous objects at the first time.

There is no evidence to see (in addition, the prosecutor did not prosecute by pointing out each stuff, etc. as dangerous things) and (3) The victim was at the police on the day of the instant case, “the defendant was faced with the left string on the back of the defendant's dust.”

“Although the victim made a statement to the effect that the diagnosis of injury to the victim did not result in an injury to the victim’s left right course, the diagnosis of injury to the victim did not appear, and ④ Even according to the first charge, the Defendant was found to have been the victim of the last decline after the first time (no statement was made about the fact that the victim was the victim of the decline, or that the Defendant was simply the victim of the decline, or that there was an injury due to the Defendant’s mere decline). As a result, the Defendant was stated in the facts charged.

arrow