A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 19, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2.5 million by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Gwangju District Court, and on August 17, 2010, a summary order of KRW 4 million by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act was issued by the same court.

On June 15, 2019, at around 10:48, the Defendant driven a C-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed Led-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous conviction in judgment: The application of an inquiry letter and a copy of each relevant summary order to statutes;

1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018; Act No. 16037, Jun. 25, 2019); the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order, various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's criminal records (the existence and frequency of the same kind of power, the interval between the time immediately preceding the same kind of power, etc.), the nature of the crime of this case, the degree of blood alcohol concentration of the defendant at the time of driving of this case, the driving distance of the defendant, the circumstances and control circumstances of the crime of this case, and whether the defendant's reflect

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.