1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution against the Plaintiff is based on the payment order for the goods in which the Defendant’s claim for the payment of goods was filed.

As the cause of the claim of this case, the plaintiff is deemed to have been led by the defendant, while the defendant as the other party to the plaintiff on February 25, 200, on the ground that on March 25, 2000, the plaintiff made installment sale of Dansan by the payment deadline of 267,500 won, and the date of repayment completion date of March 25, 200, the payment order was issued and the payment order was issued and confirmed. The claim for the above payment order is asserted that the short-term extinctive prescription period of the Civil Procedure Act is expired. Accordingly, the defendant's claim against the plaintiff is deemed to have expired. Thus, the defendant's claim of the above payment order against the plaintiff shall be deemed to have expired by the prescription period. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case for exclusion of enforcement period is accepted for the ground of the plaintiff's claim of this case,