All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendant’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of embezzlement among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. Contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, the lower court is justifiable to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on the charge of occupational embezzlement among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, on the ground that there was no proof of the facts charged. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal,

Meanwhile, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, there is no specific reason in the petition of appeal as to the guilty portion, and the appellate brief does not contain any grounds for objection.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.