The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the first instance court and the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have convicted all of the facts charged of this case on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “defensive force” in the establishment of a crime of violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, the argument that the sentence is too unreasonable cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.