1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on September 3, 2015 on the case No. 2015Da376 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant’s registered design (No. 10 No. 10) registration number/application date/registration date: No. 30-0325439 similar to 1////205 February 18, 2005: A description of a prop design for fences and major drawings (attached Form 1):

B. The basic design (certificate A) registration number/application date/registration date of the registered design of this case: Articles subject to design on May 23, 2002//Sgd. 30-0325439//registration date: A description of fenced prop design and major drawings: (attached Form 2).

(hereinafter referred to as the “basic design of this case”).

The defendant's design subject to confirmation is a prop design for a specific fence for the plaintiff's implementation (attached Form 3).

The plaintiff's implementation design (Evidence No. 8-1, 2, and 3) is a film of a fence that the plaintiff claims that the plaintiff actually produces and sells it (attached Form 4).

마. 선행디자인 1) 선행디자인 1 (갑 제3호증) 공개번호/출원일/공개일: 제2000-0000747호/2000. 1. 19./2000. 5. 15. 디자인의 대상이 되는 물품: 울타리 디자인의 주요도면: 생략 2) 선행디자인 2 (갑 제4호증) 등록번호/출원일/등록일: 제30-0269231호/1999. 10. 8./2000. 11. 14. 디자인의 대상이 되는 물품: 울타리용 지주 디자인의 설명 및 주요도면: 생략 3) 선행디자인 3 (갑 제5호증의 1) 1978. 10. 5.자 일본 특허공보 昭53-36830호에 [도11]로 게재된 ‘록심파이프’ 이형관(異形管 의 단면도로서 우측 도면과 같다.

The defendant asserts that prior designs 3 are related to pipes, and the registered design of this case and the design subject to confirmation are related to fences, and there are different goods subject to design, so the prior design 3 does not constitute prior designs in relation to the registered design of this case or the design subject to confirmation.

If a design is intended to be the same or similar design, the design is first expressed.