Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From February 201 to December 31, 2013, the Defendant worked as a store store located in 772 (Jakdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, Busan, the head office of the department store in Busan, and was engaged in the business of selling clothes, inventory management, and the collection of the purchase price for the board.
1. Around December 19, 2013, the embezzlement of the sales proceeds of clothes: (a) around December 19, 2013, the Defendant sold the clothing equivalent to KRW 1,735,650, which the victim entrusted by the F head office to Chok G; (b) received KRW 400,000 from the above G to the Busan Bank account in the name of the Defendant’s H on December 26, 2013; and (c) received KRW 4,90,000 from the Defendant’s H on or around December 28, 2013 to the Busan Bank account in his/her business for the victim; and (d) subsequently, he/she voluntarily consumed the Defendant’s personal
In addition, from September 201 to December 29, 2013, the Defendant sold goods as indicated in the attached list 1 to 5 from around September 2011 to December 29, 2013, and embezzled the total amount of KRW 211,379,90 by arbitrarily consuming KRW 211,379,90 by failing to electronically input the sales of the goods or by arbitrarily disposing of the returned clothes, etc. without returning or treating them, and by arbitrarily consuming the sales proceeds.
2. On October 31, 201, the Defendant embezzled the repair cost by voluntarily consuming KRW 1,209,50 by the same method 26 times from around that time, as shown in the annexed crime sight table 6, while receiving KRW 3,000 of the repair cost that the customer was paid to the above store and then being kept in office for the victim at work, and the Defendant used the same time without paying to the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Some of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant against the prosecutor (in relation to attached Tables 1 and 2, the amount was disputed, and a confession was recognized as being in relation to attached Tables 3 through 6)
1. C. witness, I.D.