1. The Defendant’s each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 935,250 and each of them shall be 5% per annum from August 30, 2018 to February 6, 2020.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Project approval and notification 1): Project name of an urban planning facility project (C Project) (hereinafter referred to as “project”);

2) Public notice of authorization for project implementation: The defendant

B. Subject to expropriation by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on July 5, 2018 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): Each 1/2 equity of E, 1247 square meters, respectively (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) at the time of interested parties, owned by the Plaintiffs.

2) Commencement date of expropriation: Compensation for losses on August 29, 2018: Plaintiffs’ land compensation amounting to KRW 369,423,750, respectively.

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on December 20, 2018 (hereinafter “instant objection”): The compensation for the Plaintiffs’ land compensation amounting to KRW 369,423,750 (each rejection of the Plaintiffs’ objection), respectively: F and corporation G

D. The court's entrustment of appraisal to appraiser H (hereinafter "court appraiser") and inquiry result (hereinafter "court's appraisal"): The plaintiffs' compensation amounting to 370,359,000 won (which is the ground for recognition), each of the facts that there is no dispute about the plaintiffs' compensation amounting to 370,359,000 won (which includes the ground for recognition), Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 9 (which includes the case number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of this court's entrustment of appraisal to appraiser H, and the inquiry result

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The main point of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the compensation amount set forth in the decision on the objection of this case falls considerably below the market price of each of the lands of this case. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs each of the reasonable compensation for each of the lands of this case and the compensation amount for delay corresponding to the difference between the compensation amount and the above compensation amount.

B. It is as stated in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

C. In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of the relevant legal principles 1-related legal rewards, each appraisal agency’s appraisal and appraisal by the court appraiser, which are the basis of the ruling, are excluded from individual factors and vision.