The defendants' protocol of conciliation against the plaintiff A, the Seoul Central District Court 2014Ra2356, which is a building name map, etc.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Lease 1 between the Plaintiff A and the Defendants is the Plaintiff Company A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”).

On October 6, 2014, the Defendants and the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E land (hereinafter “instant land”).

b)the buildings and their ground buildings (hereinafter referred to as the buildings of this case);

(2) Of the above, the Plaintiff and the Defendants entered into a lease agreement with respect to the rent of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 2.5 million, and the rent of KRW 2.5 million from October 17, 2014 to October 16, 2019 with respect to the land of KRW 180,223.8 square meters, and the third floor of KRW 220.98 square meters. The Plaintiff and the Defendants changed the details of the lease agreement from December 7, 2014 to December 6, 2015, with respect to the monthly rent of KRW 2.5 million from December 7, 2015 to December 6, 2019.

Plaintiff

On January 12, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court established a compromise between A and the Defendants with respect to the lease of part of the instant land and buildings on the basis of the above changed contents:

(Seoul Central District Court 2014No. 2356). 1. The Plaintiff received from the Defendants the balance obtained by deducting the overdue rent and all other public charges from the deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000, from the Defendants, and, in return, ordered the Defendants to order the Defendants to pay the second floor 223.8 square meters and the third floor 220.98 square meters among the instant building until December 6, 2019.

(2) On December 7, 2014 through December 6, 2015, Plaintiff A paid the Defendants KRW 2,50,000 (excluding value-added tax) monthly rent from December 7, 2015 to December 6, 2019, and monthly rent of KRW 3,500,000 from December 7, 2015 to December 6, 2019.

3. The Plaintiff A loses the Defendants’ benefit of the time limit set forth in paragraph (1) in the event that the sum of arrears for the payment of the amount stated in paragraph (2) from the above lease date exceeds 3-year rent in arrears. The Plaintiff A received the balance of the deposit set forth in paragraph (1) and repaid it.