logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.09.07 2017고단662
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Jeju District Court's original branch on November 21, 2006. On July 10, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime in the same court on July 10, 2008. On February 7, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a four-year sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on September 15, 2016.

1. On May 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in which the victim E was locked in the “Dpenta” located in Thai-gun C on May 20, 2017, the Defendant stolen KRW 35,000,000 in cash owned by the victim and KRW 110,000 in the parking lot.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) was driving a vehicle without a driver’s license within approximately 223 km section from the 23 km section to the viewing distance in the front city room by cutting the said car at the above time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Chapter 9 of the photograph of the case, Chapter 4 of the PDA license inquiry, and four of the photograph of the case;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, each investigation report (10, 13 on a yearly basis), each written judgment, and the application of statutes on the acceptance status of each individual;

1. Article 5-4 (5) 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. The defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of defense counsel under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes is asserting that the instant crime was committed under the mental and physical weakness due to editing. However, in light of the background leading up to the instant crime, the number of crimes, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., when considering the circumstance leading up to the instant crime.

arrow