The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing the sentencing of the gist of the grounds for appeal (the punishment of the court below: Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, confiscation, and collection);

2. Determination

A. The appellate court, compared to the first instance court, should respect the first instance sentencing judgment in a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the first instance sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

B. The lower court, under favorable circumstances, rendered a sentence by comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., as well as the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was committed during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime.

(c)

The grounds for the court below's improper sentencing alleged by the defendant are shown to have already taken into account in determining the punishment against the defendant, and the above sentencing conditions have been changed in the court below.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.