1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the preliminary claims added by this court are all dismissed.

2. Appeal costs and interest.

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased J owned the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant argument”), the real estate listed in Paragraph (2) of the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “instant housing”) and the real estate listed in Paragraph (3) of the attached Table 3 (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) respectively.

B. On February 14, 2011, Defendant G, the president of the deceased J, and Defendant H, the grandchildren, completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the entire forest of this case on the ground of donation made on January 28, 2011, with respect to the entire forest of this case on the ground that Defendant G, the president of the deceased J, and Defendant H, the grandchildren, were 4/10 shares; Defendant I, the grandchildren, 6/10 shares; and K completed the registration of transfer on the ground of donation made on January 28, 2011.

C. The deceased J died on October 4, 2012. At the time of death, the deceased’s heir and the Plaintiff, B, C, D, E, and F, a spouse, as the heir and heir.

Since then on March 23, 2015, K died on or around March 23, 2015, and K's heir is Defendant G and Defendant I and H, who is the spouse.

Upon the death of K, Defendant G completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 26, 2015 due to inheritance due to the agreement division as of March 23, 2015 with respect to the shares of 1/2 in the instant case and the forest land of this case under the name of K.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, and Gap evidence 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On January 28, 201, the 101 Plaintiffs’ summary of the Plaintiffs’ assertion on the primary claim was: (a) the Plaintiff could not express his/her intent due to dementia at the time of donation; and (b) the Plaintiff, who is the Domar, consented to the Defendant G, who was the Domar, to the effect that “if each of the instant real estate was donated to K, the inheritance procedure would be simplified, and inheritance tax would be distributed to the Domar in the future, after the gift was kept to the Domar, since the inheritance tax would also be distributed to him/her; and (c) the registration of ownership is completed in the name of K by deceiving.