1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 72,430,440 as well as 20% per annum from June 27, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 2, 2014, the Plaintiff was issued a collection order (hereinafter “instant collection order”) with respect to a claim under the conciliation protocol, such as the Seoul High Court 2010Na18234 (principal lawsuit), the amount of which was settled as of November 17, 2010, and the amount of which was settled as of November 17, 2010, by a notary public based on the original copy of an executory notarial deed No. 01402, 2013, which was drafted by the Incheon District Court Branch Branch 2014T, and the seizure and collection order was served on the Defendant on June 9, 2014.

B. C completed the apartment house (multi-household) 9 households on the ground (multi-household) of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant land”) (hereinafter “multi-household), and the Defendant was awarded a contract on June 23, 1994 and acquired the ownership of the instant land. On July 26, 2006, C and the Defendant agreed to divide profits after selling each household by registering the instant building on a group of preservation of the building, and accordingly, the registration of ownership is completed for the nine households of the instant building under the name of the Defendant on February 5, 2007.

C. Of the instant building, the sale of the remaining six households except for the 01st, 101, 201, and 202 of the ground floor among the instant buildings (hereinafter “three households”), was completed, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of each seller around September 12, 2007, and the instant three households still completed registration of ownership preservation in the name of the Defendant without selling in lots. However, the instant three households were included in the instant land and the building under the name of the Defendant, and the entire building was included in the zone subject to the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project for Zone E; the Defendant, as the owner of the instant three households and the members of the redevelopment partnership, was entitled to the right to sell the instant apartment units under 712,503, and the instant building was removed on September 12, 2007.

On the other hand, No. 202 of the building of this case.