The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, it is justifiable for the lower court to have maintained the first instance judgment that found the instant facts charged guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the scope of “a person who intends to engage in development activities” under Article 56(1) of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.