A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From February 2, 2013, the Defendant discovered the trade name, contact information, etc. of the Korean Council Members and dental hospitals nationwide through the following website or the Internet server website, and identified the account number and the name of the deposit account, stating, “I would like to request the account to be transferred because I would like to deposit I would like to deposit I would like to deposit I would like to deposit I would like to deposit I would like to be a patient’s guardian who will receive medical treatment after going through a telephone using the cell phone used by the Defendant for the relevant Korean Council members or the relevant dental hospital.”

Then, the Defendant confirmed the name of the head of the relevant hospital by using the following website, etc., and when the name of the deposit owner of the account to receive remittance and the name of the head of the relevant hospital are different, he/she makes phone calls to the relevant hospital, and makes phone calls to the head of the relevant tax office or the head of the hospital as if they were the post-delivery of the head of the relevant hospital. The Defendant requested the head of the hospital to have telephone conversations with the head of the relevant hospital, and the head of the hospital who received the phone calls as if the Defendant was the guardian of the patient who received the medical treatment at the relevant hospital. In order to deposit the medical expenses or medicine expenses, the Defendant provided a personal nurse account, etc. with the account number to be transferred from the hospital to the hospital, and provided a personal account of the nurse, etc. who is not the head of the hospital or the hospital’s name, to return the funds to the National Tax Service without having received a report on the tax evasion for the reason that he/she did not make a report to the National Tax Service or receive a tax investigation.

1. On April 25, 2013, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-si, and the Defendant, through the above methods, is deemed to have a “F Do Council member” located in the south-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, where the remittance account of medicine expenses, which was known through the above methods, is suspected of being a borrowed account.