1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. As to the instant land, F completed the registration of transfer of ownership on August 13, 1981, on the grounds of sale and purchase from its own City G on July 18, 1981, and F completed the registration of transfer of ownership on July 7, 1987 to G on July 3, 1987.

B. Since August 7, 191, G completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the donation on August 6, 1991 to Defendant C, and Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the donation on November 12, 2010 to Defendant D on May 27, 2010.

C. The F died, and the Plaintiffs, children, inherited 1/2 shares.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant’s decedent F died on July 8, 1987, and the Plaintiff’s decedent F was registered on July 7, 1987 in the G name with respect to the instant land, which was made before F’s death on July 7, 1987, with F’s seal impression, identification card, etc., without F’s awareness. In light of the fact that F did not have any reason to sell the instant land to G, it is null and void in light of the fact that F did not have any reason to sell the instant land, and each registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Plaintiffs, which was made based on this, is null and void. Therefore, the Defendants are obliged to perform the registration of transfer on the instant land by one-half shares each of F’s successors

B. (1) It is insufficient to view that the testimony of Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, 7, and 8 (including each number), and witness H was made using the F’s seal imprint, identification card, etc. in the name of G on July 7, 1987, when the transfer registration of ownership on the land of this case was made in the absence of awareness of F, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

(2) There is no evidence that the sale between F and G is false.

(3) Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion.