beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant
A 3,500,000 won, Defendant B 6,000,000 won, and Defendant C.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (a fine of 15 million won, a fine of 15 million won, a fine of 15 million won, a fine of 25 million won, a fine of 25 million won, and a fine of 15 million won) is too unreasonable.
2. The defendants recognized the facts charged in this case and reflected against the judgment of the court below. On August 2012, the abolition of the restriction on the number of single house units in the instant area due to the abolition of the restriction on the number of house units in the instant area by the designation of a general industrial complex and the announcement of the approval of the alteration of the implementation plan for the instant area by the Gyeonggi-do Governor on the designation of a general industrial complex and the announcement of the alteration of the implementation plan for the instant area. The residents in the instant area, including the defendants, purchased the land from the Si of the Si of the Gu of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the Republic of Korea.
3. Accordingly, according to the conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following is again decided after pleading.
Criminal facts
The summary of the evidence and the facts charged against the Defendants and the summary of the evidence admitted by this court are as follows: (a) adding the Defendants’ respective statements in this Court to the summary column of the evidence of the judgment below; and (b) deleted the Defendants’ respective legal statements; and (c) deleted the “each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants.”