A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 6 million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Gwangju District Court's net support on June 1, 201. On June 19, 2013, the same court issued a summary order of 5 million won as a fine for the same crime. On February 1, 2017 in the same court, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of 8 months for the same crime and 2 years for suspended execution, and was sentenced to imprisonment of 8 months for the same crime.

On May 26, 2018, the Defendant driven D SM5 automobiles with approximately 200 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.237% in blood without a driver’s license on the road near the traditional market parking lot for a long time, which was 60,000 square meters near the traditional market, and around that time, from around 200 to the road in front of the same 8-lane 9, PP5 car under the influence of alcohol level without a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The application of inquiry, written judgments, and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. In full view of the criminal records of the Defendant’s reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act, the degree of alcohol concentration among the blood of the Defendant at the time of driving of the instant case, the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s control over the instant crime, the Defendant’s family relation, etc., and the various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and the changed theories, such as the Defendant’s family relation.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.