The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds for excluding the expression of intent or illegality in the crime of non-compliance with the punishment

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the argument that there was an error of misunderstanding of the legal principles as to the victim's identity as to the crime committed against the victim I is alleged in the lower judgment, and it is not a legitimate ground for appeal, since the Defendant’s ground for appeal or the lower court’s judgment did not make it subject to ex officio determination

According to Article 383 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, a final appeal shall be allowed on the grounds of unfair sentencing.

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.